"It's ok guys"

JoshuaLamont-Calvin-Dec2017-WEB-3.jpg

There is power in the phrase, ‘We don’t do that at Calvin!’

You will hear this phrase uttered in conversations between students, and stafftalking to students and other teachers. It is a simple phrase that defines andreinforces our cultural expectations. Uttering the phrase is an easy, direct and clear way to tell someone that their language and/or behaviour varies from the expected standards. It communicates what we value and the standards we value.

Culture is more than the published rules of an organisation, school or family. Culture is the collection of all the values, assumptions, and expectations, including those that exist but are not stated. We might declare being punctual as an expectation and even establish a rule to that effect. However, if we then fail to comment when people are late to meetings, then tardiness becomes the culture despite any rule. The cultural setting is determined by the response to behaviour.

The culture of the accepted norms is more powerful than new ideas and initiatives.

A clear sense of culture is a critical element in a successful organisation. There is an accepted maxim that, ‘Culture eats strategy for lunch, all day, every day.’ The culture of the accepted norms is more powerful than new ideas and initiatives.

Have you noticed the cultural norm that tacitly accepts using the word ‘guys’
when speaking to a group of men and women? Most familiar to me is the conversational sign off, ‘Thanks guys’. Also popular is, ‘would you guys...’ followed by an instruction. We may trumpet the belief that ‘girls can do anything’, and even build our science initiatives to promote more females in senior science classes; yet if these young women’s visibility remains unrecognised in our speech when sitting with boys then we undermine our initiatives, our strategy, their self- esteem, and our character. The culture trumps the strategy. Accordingly, I have asked Calvin staff to monitor their language with the purpose of eliminating using the word ‘guys’ when talking to a mixed gender group. As parents you are members of our community, and therefore contributors to our culture. I would ask you also to monitor your language in this regard.

A culture absolutely benefits the individual. A culture brings empowerment and significance to people’s lives. An aspirational endeavour ignites the possibility of success. A culture of respect brings the affirmation of individual decency.

A student at Calvin should be advantaged by our culture. The community norms should inspire personal improvement and develop restraint to impulses. The standards of behaviour and application should affirm to anyone that their best isrespected, required and able to be recruited. The collective high expectations of people will become the new normal for the individual.

We build a culture through the twin response of confronting challenging individual behaviour that falls short of our norms, and affirming and encouraging the examples of preferred and ideal choices.

We must be aware that a strong culture advantages your children.

A challenged individual often retorts with, ‘Look at the others! I am not the only one’. This is an appeal to the rulership of theindividual. Such a view only needs to find one other errant example to justify their own mediocrity. It is an appeal that thelowest standards become the rule not the exception. It is a claim of disbelief that greater achievement is not possible.

We must be aware that a strong culture advantages your children. We are working to build such a culture at Calvin. We build it through our response to uniform, attendance, homework, and courtesy. These are the frontlines from which we defend ourselves against more grievous issues.

The protest statement will always be, ‘Look, someone else is doing the wrong thing as well!’ The antidote is the power in actually saying, ‘We don’t do that at Calvin’.

Iain Belôt - Principal

Faith Demands Action

The existence of my faith is the cause and motivation of my works in the world.

What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works?’
— James 2:14
JoshuaLamont-Calvin-Dec2017-WEB-3.jpg

I once asked one of the founders of our school why he chose to join the Dutch resistance movement against the Nazis in World War Two. He replied, ‘Because my faith demanded it!’ His tone resonated with the rejection of any notion that belief could fail to harness action.

At a recent conference I listened to Dr. Rod Thomson, the Principal of the National Institute of Christian Education, speak on the topic of, ‘How do we engage the world?’ Rod’s speechwas influenced by James Davidson Hunter’s book ‘To Change the World: the irony, tragedy,and possibility of Christianity in the late modern world.’

Rod emphasised that we must deeply engage with scripture and the daily devotions. Abiding in God is vital. In this abiding in Him, our private faith is strengthened, deepened, and fuelled.

However, this abiding in the Lord will produce an inevitable tension in us with regard to the circumstances of the world. Rod Thompson reviewed Hunter’s four types of engagement with the world. They are as follows:

  1. Taking a defensiveness against the world and exhibiting a commitment to winning back the power of Christendom’s sovereignty. Other authors have labelled this domination in that people seek to restore the power lost to the secular world. Other commentators have referred to this as ‘turning back the clock’.

  2. Seeking an authentic connection to the world, and accepting some accommodation with the world.

  3. Ensuring that purity is preserved from the tainting of the world. This has been described as seeking a fortification from the world.

  4. Adopting a faithful presence within the world. In this approach a person works not to triumph over others, but to work for theirflourishing. We are not seeking to have the world change, although we might desire it to and pray for it to be more representative ofthe Kingdom. We love the world because God loves the world. We seek to protect, care for, and critique the place to which we are called. In living a faithful presence, we manage the inevitable tension between this difference; between how the world actually is and how we would like it to be. We steer a middle course, not of compromise and concession but of difference making in prayer, word and deed.

The Serenity Prayer is indicative of this thinking:

‘God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

Living one day at a time, enjoying one moment at a time; accepting hardship as a pathway to peace; taking, as Jesus did, this sinful world as it is, not as I would have it; trusting that You will make all things right if I surrender to Your will; so that I may be reasonable happy in this life and supremely happy with You forever in the next.’ Amen. Reinhold Niebuhr

Our worldview needs to include how we choose to engage with the world. Walking in faith is walking in the world. We bring Christ into circumstances and make a difference ‘Because our faith demands it!’

Iain Belôt - Principal